MEPs Versus 3(16) — Which 'Wins' For You?

Both options are touted to drive down total costs, alleviate administrative headaches and severely reduce client fiduciary liability — but do they?

These much-talked about “disruptors” promise (threaten?) to change the way TPAs do business.  The majority of TPAs are offering some sort of 3(16) product today – but are you doing it well?  And could you do it better?

 “It’s the segment of my businesses where I see almost unlimited growth potential over the next few years,” explains Sue Perry, President, Edberg & Perry, Inc. “That means that maybe I won’t be working until I’m 80.”

MEPs? Well, they’ve been with us for a while, expanded some with association retirement plans, but — once the SECURE Act passes… will your business model still work? Will it be a game-changer, or a game over? 

You’ll discover the issues, challenges and opportunities — and have a chance to debate them all with Perry, and James R. Nolan, QPA, Chairman of the Board, The Nolan Company — and walk away with some definite ideas as to whether you’ll want to move forward with creating a MEP or 3(16) product. 

Be sure to check out:

Workshop 51: 3(16) & MEP Service Offerings
Monday, Oct. 21, 2019
4:25–5:15 p.m.  

And the rest of the #ASPPAAnnual agenda at www.asppaannual.org.