Skip to main content

You are here

Advertisement

Plan Sponsors’ Internal Controls Key to Effective Governance

Practice Management
Many plan sponsors seek the assistance of TPAs with the functions and responsibilities associated with running a retirement plan, but that does not absolve a plan sponsor from all responsibility. A recent blog entry argues that internal controls are key to fulfilling the duties plan sponsors can’t outsource, as well as to managing the relationship with outside service providers.
 
Diane Wasser, the Partner-in-Charge of EisnerAmper LLP’s New Jersey office and founder and Partner-in-Charge of the firm’s Pension Services Group, examines sample plan controls and user controls related to a plan’s third-party service providers in “Employee Benefit Plans: Internal Controls for Processes and Governance,” an entry in the firm’s blog.

Outsourcing may be common, says Wasser, a plan sponsor cannot farm out all of its responsibilities for the plan. Plan sponsors often ignore operations and internal controls, she writes, and posits that plan management sometimes behaves “as if the plan is on autopilot.” And Wasser writes that third party service providers make the plan sponsor’s responsibilities clear, but those plan sponsors generally overlook them anyway.
 
“Most problems we see occur from the lack of both oversight and attention to a plan’s governing documents and service agreements,” Wasser says. For instance, she notes that a plan sponsor maintains:
 
  • the plan document;
  • payroll information; and 
  • participant demographic data.
The most common operational problems, Wasser says, include:
 
  • definition of compensation;
  • eligibility provisions;
  • timely deposit of deferrals; and
  • automatic enrollment shortfalls.
Internal Controls
 
Wasser argues that strong plan governance and implementing internal controls can help in complying with applicable laws and regulations. Those include preventative controls—to discourage errors or fraud—and detective controls are designed to identify errors or fraud that have taken place.
Internal controls can include:
 
  • Executing a plan document that outlines the terms of the plan and describes contribution requirements and calculation bases and limitations and updating processes.
  • Establishing initial controls over contribution records for employer and participant contributions.
  • Putting procedures in place to assure compliance with regulatory and reporting requirements.
  • Reviewing reports trustees/asset custodians or investment managers submit.
  • Regularly comparing control totals from participants’ records to control totals from trust reports.
  • Separating responsibilities for approving benefits, recording benefits and maintaining participant files.
  • Periodically corresponding with retirees.
  • Comparing payroll records with contribution calculations.
  • Properly remitting participant contributions to the plan’s trust.
Even Third Parties
 
Outsourcing is ideal for variety of functions, says Wasser, such as: 
 
  • allocation of employee and employer contributions to participants’ accounts;
  • investment options participants select;
  • allocation of gains and losses on investments participants select;
  • transfers among investment options;
  • changes to participant deferral percentages;
  • distribution requests from participant accounts; and
  • calculating proper vesting.
But even when outsourcing, a plan sponsor needs to be attentive. For instance, she suggests review of third-party service provider system and organization control reports, including complementary user controls. She also suggests that subsidiary contribution records be reconciled to the trustee/asset custodian or third-party administrator reports.
 
The Bottom Line
 
“Plan operations should be taken seriously, and plan sponsors should take the time to understand their responsibilities, because they are making a fiduciary decision to engage their service providers to provide the processing of plan transactions,” argues Wasser.