Skip to main content

You are here

Advertisement

Beware Mismatched Definitions of ‘Compensation’

Practice Management

There are many reasons that errors in plan operation may take place. An industry expert lays some of the blame on disconnection between the way a plan defines compensation and the way it functions.

Christine P. Roberts, a benefits attorney practicing at Mullen & Henzell, LLP, in the E is for ERISA blog says that disconnect generates “a significant number” of operational failures. 

Such errors, Roberts writes, include: 

  • Adding payroll codes to a system without applying participants’ deferral elections and employer contribution to those payroll amounts. 
  • Carving out categories such as bonuses, commissions and overtime from a plan’s definition of compensation, without stopping deferrals and employer contributions from those amounts.  
  • Overlooking categories of pay, such as tips recorded on credit cards. 
  • Confusion over the scope of categories referred to in the safe harbor definitions of compensation, such as nontaxable fringe benefits and differential wage payments.  

Action Steps 

Roberts suggests some steps that can be taken to avoid such mismatches. These include:

Remember that certain pay items—for instance, cash and/or non-cash fringe benefits, reimbursements, expense allowances and moving expenses—may be excluded from “safe harbor” definitions of compensation; however, exclusions such as overtime will trigger the need to perform annual testing of the definition of compensation under nondiscrimination rules. 

Holding an annual meeting in which human resources and payroll personnel compare the definition of compensation in the adoption agreement and the payroll codes in use. Roberts adds that such a comparison could be helpful when:

  • payroll practices are modified;
  • there is a change in payroll practices, vendors or software; and 
  • if the plan’s definition of compensation changes. 

If a plan defines compensation in a way that involves carve-outs, act to ensure that salary deferrals and employer contributions are not applied to the payroll code amounts that correspond to the exclusions—such as bonuses, commissions and overtime.

All comments
David Kupstas
2 years 9 months ago
I find a lot of the rules on compensation definition to be very confusing. One's first inclination might be to use the number on a box on the W-2, maybe adjusted to remove bonuses, overtime, and commissions. But then you have all these other definitions with Code Sections like 414(s), 415(c), and 3401(a). This item or that item is included or excluded. I've been in the business for 27 years and can't keep it all straight, so I can see how someone who doesn't deal with this on a regular basis would have a lot of trouble.